AD: Mesquite Gaming

The most popular online news source, publishing news as it happens in Mesquite, Nevada. * 702.346.6432 * barbara@mesquitecitizen.com * Barbara Ellestad, Publisher * ALL Content Copyright 2011-2014

Wednesday, July 23, 2014
MESQUITE NEWS 
SPORTS 
HIGH SCHOOL SPORTS 
OPINIONS 
WRITER'S CORNER 
COMMUNITY 
CONSUMER NEWS 
MARKETPLACE 
INTERACTIVE 

This week's poll

Has the NSA gone too far in its data collection efforts?

Yes, they need to stop
No, they are keeping us safe
I don't care

View Poll Report

 Keywords:
one or more words required
all words required
forced & ordered phrase
Multi forced & ordered phrase
words with exceptions
Help
 
 Issue date:
Date Format: dd-mm-yyyy

   
John Roberts is a Genius
Posting Date: 07/02/2012

Terry Donnelly

If anyone wants to doubt the genius of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, that person will have to come through me. That may seem like an odd statement from your resident bleeding heart liberal columnist about the ultra conservative judge, but facts are facts.

Justice Roberts is being both regaled and villanized for his swing vote on the Affordable Care Act ruling in which his vote allowed the specifics of the act to go forward. Liberals are celebrating and conservatives are already scheming.

But, where is the Roberts genius in all this?

First, Chief Justice Roberts may have saved the integrity of the Supreme Court. The court has approval numbers much like Congress–lower than a snake’s belly. The public was getting tired of an activist court making predictable 5-4 decisions split along ideology lines. The court isn’t supposed to be ideological, but that is only true in a perfect world.

The rulings of the Supreme Court are the last word on whether or not an issue is constitutional. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky was dead wrong when he addressed the public sharing his disappointment with the ruling saying, “Just because a couple of Supreme Court judges say so doesn’t make a law constitutional.”

Well, it does. That is the court’s only function. However, there is no higher system to make citizens agree. The court has to rely on public opinion for their trust and support. Roberts may have gone a long way toward restoring faith in the court by making a tough call.

Next, Roberts showed his brilliance because he may have saved the reputation of this specific court bearing his name. Take away all the politics and diverse ideas about both health care and private health insurance companies, the act is and will continue to improve and expand the health care system for millions of people who must risk total family ruin due to any type of illness.

He likely did not want to go down in history as the leader of the court that took away health care from young adults who could be included in their family’s policy while they got started in the work force. Or, go down in history as the leader of the court that gave back insurance companies’ ability to refuse sick people, cancel insured folks

when they get sick, limit the company’s liability to pay out claims, and have unrestricted ability to raise premiums–he didn’t want to be that guy!

Some people are expecting a check from their medical insurance companies this summer because the act limits how much premium money can be paid to CEOs and administrative costs. Many companies did not comply and, under the act, owe their insured clients some cash back. Roberts did not want to be the guy that ruined a summer vacation.

The true genius came in the way he wrote the opinion. The challenge to the act was primarily due to the conservatives contending that the government could not force citizens to buy insurance under the umbrella of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. That clause states that if you use something, you can be forced to pay for it. If you use highways, you can be forced to pay road fees. The argument was that uninsured people were not using a part of the health care system, so the clause did not apply.

Roberts agreed with his fellow conservatives. But, he took the next step to save his court specifically and the Supreme Court in general by moving the rationale to the tax code. He ruled that the government could indeed tax citizens who did not comply with health insurance laws.

So, for now, the Affordable Care Act stands as written and is on track to become fully functional by 2014. But, by moving the mandate from the realm of interstate commerce into tax law, Roberts slyly provided a political inroad to his conservative friends to more easily overturn the act.

Congress is in political gridlock. Every Senate issue is threatened with a filibuster that takes 60 votes to crack. But wait, tax issues are a different animal. Taxes can be considered through tax reconciliation. Those issues cannot be filibustered and are passable with a simple majority–51 votes. Chief Justice Roberts knows this.

If the 2012 election stars align the way Republicans plan–they win the White House, keep control of the House of Representatives, and gain, even a 50-50 split in the Senate–the Affordable Care Act can easily be repealed because a 50-50 vote in the Senate would be resolved by the Vice President, whomever that may be in a November Republican win.

If this doesn’t fire up both parties to get out the vote, I don’t know what will.

 

Commentary
  • Posted Date: 07/02/2012
    Very well done. People need to really understand there are more really important issues our country faces than Obamacare. Congress is crumbling and the Supreme Court was heading that way too. Roberts did a great thing and we should all should respect that.
    By: Margorie
  •  
  • Posted Date: 07/02/2012
    Excellent analysis and insight. Good job Terry. It was high time for the justices to start considering the validity of issues rather than following political ideologies.
    By: Justsayin2
  •  
  • Posted Date: 07/02/2012
    What people don't realize is what Roberts did was historical. The ACA is not a major issue. We give billions upon billions daily to foreign countries and spend more billions on wars and vets who get hurt. Roberts was right. This is not the major issue. What about jobs and the economy? Complainers would rather not talk about that.
    By: Jason
  •  
  • Posted Date: 07/02/2012
    By focusing all this attention on the ACA, politicians are distracting people from things we should be paying attention to and things that show the candidates weaknesses. Roberts was right.
    By: Henry
  •  
  • Posted Date: 07/02/2012
    Now, time for the Fed's to get back to business and start enforcing the Immigration Laws as written. Time to round up and deport every single illegal criminal in this country. Time to remove them from our schools, welfare, and so forth. Time to seal the borders. Get to work Congress or YOU will be out of a job.
    By: ralph
  •  
  • Posted Date: 07/02/2012
    "I strongly disagree with today’s decision by the Supreme Court, but I am not surprised. The Court has a dismal record when it comes to protecting liberty against unconstitutional excesses by Congress. "Today we should remember that virtually everything government does is a 'mandate.' The issue is not whether Congress can compel commerce by forcing you to buy insurance, or simply compel you to pay a tax if you don’t. The issue is that this compulsion implies the use of government force against those who refuse. The fundamental hallmark of a free society should be the rejection of force. In a free society, therefore, individuals could opt out of “Obamacare” without paying a government tribute. "Those of us in Congress who believe in individual liberty must work tirelessly to repeal this national health care law and reduce federal involvement in healthcare generally. Obamacare can only increase third party interference in the doctor-patient relationship, increase costs, and reduce the quality of care. Only free market medicine can restore the critical independence of doctors, reduce costs through real competition and price sensitivity, and eliminate enormous paperwork burdens. Americans will opt out of Obamacare with or without Congress, but we can seize the opportunity today by crafting the legal framework to allow them to do so." Ron Paul June 28 2012 NUFF SAID
    By: Barlie
  •  
  • Posted Date: 07/02/2012
    Again, He did what He thought was right, and not swayed by the politicans.
    By: Elf
  •  
  • Posted Date: 07/02/2012
    Margotie: what great thing did he do? He just gave congress the power to tax us for ANYTHING under the sun! You breathing will be taxed next CO2 google it. JUSTSAYIN2: The issues they need to consider is the Constitution. Nothing else cause that's their job not social issues. JUST CONSTITUTIONALITY. JASON: you need to research Ron Paul you are already there. Welcome Aboard!!! HENRY: Roberts got it wrong, hands down. He did this to cause more turmoil by calling it a tax. The biggest in History.. think about it he is conservative supposedly. Rand is right thet just a bunch of black robes pretending to serve justice. Just my thoughts peeps peace. out.
    By: Barlie
  •  
  • Posted Date: 07/03/2012
    for Barlie who must watch alot of fox http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/07/2-of-the-last-3-gop-presidents-signed-larger-tax-increases-than-obamacare/259300/
    By: mike
  •  
     
    Name  
    Email  
    Opinion (2000 Characters)  
    Publish My Opinion    
     
    CAPTCHA Image
    Reload Image
     
     

            Get our toolbar!