AD: David BallwegAD: David Ballweg

The most popular online news source, publishing news as it happens in Mesquite, Nevada. * 702.346.6432 * barbara@mesquitecitizen.com * Barbara Ellestad, Publisher

Saturday, May 18, 2013
MESQUITE NEWS 
MCJ CONTESTS 
VVHS JOURNALISM CLUB 
SPORTS 
OPINIONS 
WRITER'S CORNER 
COMMUNITY 
CONSUMER NEWS 
MARKETPLACE 
INTERACTIVE 

This week's poll

What should be the outcome of the current IRS scandal in which certain tax-exempt groups were targeted for further review?

Someone should be fired
Someone should go to jail
Nothing, it was an honest mistake

View Poll Report

 Keywords:
one or more words required
all words required
forced & ordered phrase
Multi forced & ordered phrase
words with exceptions
Help
 
 Issue date:
Date Format: dd-mm-yyyy

   

Honoring
Armed Forces Day
Thanks to all who serve

------------------------

Mesquite Star Nursery
Grand Opening
Saturday, May 18
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

--------------------------------

 "The Subject Was Roses"
Mesquite Community Theatre
Friday, May 17, 7:00 p.m.
Saturday, May 18, 2:00 p.m.

--------------------------------

May Photo Contest Voting Now Open



VVWD Board Approves Policy Changes, Hires New Lobbyist
Posting Date: 06/20/2012

By Barbara Ellestad
VVWD Board approved a one year contract with lobbyist Warren Hardy at its June 19 meeting. Photo by Barbara Ellestad.

VVWD Board approved a one year contract with
lobbyist Warren Hardy at its June 19 meeting.
Photo by Barbara Ellestad.

Two changes to the Virgin Valley Water District (VVWD) Cross Connection and Backflow Policy were approved by the Board of Directors at their June 19 meeting along with hiring a new State lobbyist, approving budget augmentations, and refunding $15,473 to a customer.

John Zarate, District staff member, explained to the Directors that by adding certified testers who belong to the American Backflow Prevention Association, in addition to those who belong to the American Waterworks Association, the District could increase the number of technicians able to test backflow equipment. That could make the industry more competitive and give ratepayers who require annual equipment testing more choices.

This type of equipment prevents water from backing up through a system and possibly contaminating public water supplies if not repaired.

The second major change to the policy will allow the District to test backflow equipment or make repairs on the systems and bill customers at almost twice the rate as private companies would charge.

Zarate explained that most of the time the District doesn't have a problem with customers complying with annual equipment testing requirements. "On occasion we have property owners who feel it unnecessary or don't want to comply. They try to wait it out or see if we'll take care of it. We want to create incentives for these businesses to take care of it themselves. It costs the District and ratepayers more money if we do the testing for these businesses."

The proposed device-testing charges vary based on the size of the water meter servicing the customer. For a small meter, private certified testers would charge between $75 and $100, Zarate told the Board. "We would charge $225. We want to make it steep. We want to get their attention."

He mentioned that the District has a list of 12 to 15 certified testers available to businesses in the area. "By allowing the additional testers from the American Backflow Prevention Association, that will increase the number of testers businesses can choose from. We're not trying to take them for a ride, but we want the businesses to be responsible."

Sandra Ramaker, Board member, asked why the District would not want to be responsible for the testing. "Most places are."

Zarate explained that some Water Districts take on the responsibility for testing the backflow equipment while others don't.

"We are concerned about the liability if we become responsible for someone else's equipment," General Manager Ken Rock explained.

The Board voted 4-0 to accept the changes to the policy. Board President Karl Gustaveson was absent from the meeting.

Additionally, the

Board of Directors voted 3-1 to hire Warren Hardy as the District's state lobbyist with a monthly retainer of $2,500.

Randy Robison of Capital Strategies has served as the VVWD lobbyist for almost 15 years. He has accepted a position with Century Link, as its Director of Government Affairs. Century Link is a private enterprise that provides telephone, Internet, and television access to businesses and individuals.

Hardy served as the Board's original lobbyist in the early 1990s when the District was first formed. He also served as a Senator in the Nevada State Legislature for six years, leaving there in 2009. He previously worked for the Association of Building Contractors.

"Some of the issues you're dealing with now are issues Warren dealt with years ago," Robison told the Board. "You won't miss a beat. He's up to speed on water issues."

The Board voted 3-1 to sign a professional services contract with Hardy for the period July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013. Ramaker was the lone nay vote saying, "I don't know Warren at all or a lot about him. Sometimes I would like to see us start fresh and hire someone who hasn't been doing this."

The Board quickly voted 4-0 to refund $15,473 to a customer, Anthem Park Mesquite, LLC, who was overcharged because of a software error in the billing program.

Rock explained that the billing error was caused by a computer glitch between the meter reading software and the billing software. "The bill was 10 times higher than it should have been. The software added an extra zero to the bill. This is the only one we've seen."

The Directors approved, on a 4-0 vote, formal budget augmentation documents for the current fiscal year that are required by Nevada Revised Statutes.

Wes Smith, VVWD Accountant, explained to the Board that "in some instances we've had expenses that went down and in other cases we had expenses that went up" through the past year. The most significant difference occurred in the Repairs & Maintenance expense category that Smith was revising downward by $260,000.

"We had some revenue categories that were way down and other revenues that were way up," Smith added. A decline in customers' water use, brought in $200,000 less than originally projected a year ago.

"We went from a projected net loss of $869,277 to an actual net gain of $2,334,223," he said.

Much of that difference is attributed to the $2.7 million dollar legal settlement the District received from Vanguard Piping in May.

Click here to access the budget augmentation documents for Revenues, Expenses, and Net Income.

Click here to access the budget augmentation documents for the Statement of Cash Flows.

 

Commentary
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    I can't believe the VVWD. Hiring Hardy is just asking to go backwards into all the mess they are trying to get out of. Hardy works for himself, no one else and he is too closely related to contractors. Think about it -contractors.
    By: Bill
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    Just when I thought that the old-boy network of self-dealing insiders was starting to be rooted out, the VVWD takes a giant step backward. My faith in Ken Rock to make good decisions is severely diminished. Maybe we need to change the name to the Bunkerville Insiders Water District.
    By: John
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    Guess who Hardy is related to? Right. Half of Bunkerville. The other half are guys who do business with VVWD. Can you spell "stupid mistake"? Ken Rock should have his head examined.
    By: Paul
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    The VVWD accountant says “"We went from a projected net loss of $869,277 to an actual net gain of $2,334,223," he said. “Much of that difference is attributed to the $2.7 million dollar legal settlement the District received from Vanguard Piping in May.” I thought that money was supposed to be “set aside” or “escrowed” to fix the vanguard pipe damages now and in the future! THAT was what was represented to HOA’s and others who have had the “bad pipe” problems. It is now one month after receiving the money and it seems that it is already being used as part of the slush fund for the VVWD – doesn’t look like it took ‘em long to grab the $$$$ for other uses! Maybe it’s time for the HOA’s that represent the affected homeowners to “lawyer up” to make sure the people negatively affected by the bad pipe problems get the benefit of the legal settlement before it all disappears to pay Hardy Construction, Hardy Consulting, or Hardy Lobbying.
    By: justsayin2
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    To: JustSayin2 Please allow me to clarify your allegation "I thought that money was supposed to be “set aside” or “escrowed” to fix the vanguard pipe damages now and in the future! THAT was what was represented to HOA’s and others who have had the “bad pipe” problems. It is now one month after receiving the money and it seems that it is already being used as part of the slush fund for the VVWD – doesn’t look like it took ‘em long to grab the $$$$ for other uses!" The Vanguard settlement has been "set aside" in a separate budget line item that is diligently being accounted for and only used to fix the 'bad pipe' problem. Wes Smith, the accountant, is providing a monthly list of expenditures from that money to the Board of Directors. He also is not making any transfers out of that fund to reimburse the general expenditure fund without the Board's consent. There is no need, in my opinion, to get anyone riled up about mis-using those funds. The District has gone out of its way, way out of its way, to work with the HOAs and ensure the associations are treated fairly. Lots of people are watching that money, including this reporter, and aren't charging extraneous legal fees to do so. However, the District must still account for the money in its budget documents. To do so otherwise would be the travesty. Because it is included in the documents, it is included in the 'bottom-line' numbers. I intentionally included links to the two documents that the Board approved last night. Please print them off and peruse them. Had I not made the statement that much of the change in the District's bottom line was due to the $2.7 million settlement, you would have wondered why such a drastic change.
    By: Barbara Ellestad
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    Thanks Barbara
    By: Ted Miller
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    Guess our high hopes for the water district went down the drain. Hiring Warren Hardy proves it. When will the clutches of the local good old boy system ever release us taxpayers? Time to fire Rock who must now be considered useless.
    By: bobbiethompson
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    Barbara, Thanks for your comments. However, I DID review the documents you referenced in your article and they both clearly show the $2.7 Million legal settlement funds in the General Fund and have NO notations about its uses being restricted or reserved in any way. In fact, the quoted statement by the VVWD accountant of “We went from a projected net loss of $869,277 to an actual net gain of $2,334,223," he said. “Much of that difference is attributed to the $2.7 million dollar legal settlement the District received from Vanguard Piping in May.” basically implies that some of the money was used to offset a “net loss” in the operating budget and turn it into a “net gain”. The term “net loss” is typically used to describe income or loss from operations, not from one-time non-recurring events. Including the funds in a budget also implies their availability for general uses, thus the deposit of it in the “General Fund”. While many folks, including you and me, are watching what happens to the funds there is not yet, to my knowledge, any legal or contractual obligation for the VVWD to restrict their use of those funds. The HOA’s were told in early meetings that the VVWD would not object to putting the funds in an escrow account that was legally restricted as to it’s uses, but such has not been done yet. Why? I’m not trying to “rile anybody up”, just trying to point out that a binding restriction for the uses of the settlement funds has not been yet been accomplished. Yes, today the board of the VVWD is approving or disapproving uses of those funds, but is there anything restricting them in the future from deciding that the money is theirs to do with as they please? I would actually not have a problem with the VVWD reimbursing itself for the money they have actually spent doing repairs and financing the lawsuit but the balance should be set aside in a separate fund and budget instead of being lumped into the general fund. Non-recurring revenues, especially of this amoun
    By: Justsayin2
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    Hiring Hardy was a big mistake. Now I challenge the board to keep tabs on him and see what he produces for that monthly fee. My bet is he will do nothing. How about a monthly report from him to the board - IN WRITING.
    By: Stan
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/20/2012
    A monthly report is a good idea. Accountability Mr Rock, seemms like you're getting away from that.
    By: Charlie
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/21/2012
    To all of you "bashing" Ken Rock for hiring Hardy please review the story where it says "The Board voted 3-1 to sign a professional services contract with Hardy for the period July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013. Ramaker was the lone nay vote". The Board hired Hardy, not Ken Rock. I have no idea what Mr. Rocks position is regarding this matter, but it is improper to chastise him for something he did not do! He may be just as disgusted with this decision as the rest of us!
    By: John
  •  
  • Posted Date: 06/21/2012
    This is a bad decision. Hardy left the legislature in 2009 following ethical complaints. The water board needs to continue to improve its image in the eyes of the public and hiring Hardy clouds that progress and raises questions about the integrity of those who voted for Hardy.
    By: mmcgreer
  •  
     
    Name  
    Email  
    Opinion (2000 Characters)  
    Publish My Opinion    
     
    CAPTCHA Image
    Reload Image
     
     
    05/18/2013 - Stories You May Have Missed, May 13-17, 2013
    05/17/2013 - Tiny Dancers Jilted Out Of Recital
    05/17/2013 - Mesquite City Manager Community Forum Scheduled
    05/17/2013 - Battle Over Country Club Liquor License Continues
    05/16/2013 - NWS Issues Wind Advisory For Mesquite Area
    05/16/2013 - Pati Awarded Key To City-Video
    05/16/2013 - Boys And Girls Clubs Makes Mesquite Presentation-Video
    05/16/2013 - Tracing Your Roots - Video
    05/15/2013 - Mesquite Council Approves New Communication Tower-Video
    05/15/2013 - Mesquite Memorial Day Services Announced
    05/15/2013 - OPD Board To Appoint New General Manager
    05/14/2013 - Frank Pati Honored with Senior Games Quilt
    05/14/2013 - Routine Items On Tonight's Council Agenda
    05/13/2013 - Star Nursery Opens In Mesquite-Slideshow
    05/12/2013 - Former Mesquite Fire Chief Commits Suicide
    05/12/2013 - This Week's Calendar - May 12-18, 2013
    05/11/2013 - Stories You May Have Missed, May 6-10, 2013
    05/10/2013 - Hafen Testifies in Water District Hearing-Video
    05/09/2013 - Chamber Hosts Council Candidate Forum-Video
    05/09/2013 - Public Land Fire Restrictions Put In Place-Video
    05/08/2013 - Water District Passes New Employee Policies-Video
    05/08/2013 - Mesquite City Employee Salary Information Released
    05/07/2013 - Lightening Strike Sets Palm Ablaze
    05/07/2013 - Sun City Comm Tower On Tech Review Agenda
    05/07/2013 - Rate Study Proposal On VVWD Board Agenda
    05/06/2013 - Mesquite Casino Owners Provide Property Updates
    05/06/2013 - Mesquite WWII Veterans Hailed at Honor Flight - Slideshow, Video
    05/06/2013 - Mesquite Tea Party Hosts Candidate Forum-Video
    05/06/2013 - Mesquite Days Breakfast And Parade - Video, Slideshow
    05/03/2013 - Confirmed - Oasis Casino Demolition Begins Saturday
    05/03/2013 - Golf Long Drivers Reveal New Speedway Venue-Video, Slideshow
    05/03/2013 - Mesquite Star Nursery Looking For Workers
    05/03/2013 - April Restaurant Health Inspections
    05/02/2013 - Courtroom Videos Reveal Details Of Water District Lawsuits
    05/02/2013 - RTC Holding Trail Study Public Meeting
    05/01/2013 - Mesquite Resident Chosen First State-Wide Senior Citizen Of Year
    05/01/2013 - Mesquite Council Candidates Meet The Press
    05/01/2013 - Mesquite Showgirls Meet Rescue Donkeys
    04/30/2013 - Changes Coming to 911 Dispatch Center
    04/29/2013 - Country Club Liquor Sales Suspension Riles Homeowners
    04/26/2013 - March Building Permits Continue Upward Trend
    04/25/2013 - Murder Suspects Appear In Mesquite Court-Courtroom Video
    04/25/2013 - 'One Hero At A Time' Benefit Scheduled
    04/24/2013 - Council Approves Additional MSEC Trails
    04/24/2013 - Community Youth Center Begins Long Road To Fruition-Video
    04/24/2013 - Star Nursery Delays Mesquite Opening
    04/23/2013 - ¡Yo quiero Taco Bell
    04/18/2013 - OPD Provides Update Of Bond Funding-Video
    04/15/2013 - Eureka Makes Purchase Bid For Mesquite Star
    04/05/2013 - New Mother, Stricken By Cancer, Needs Your Help
    03/14/2013 - Mayor Proclaims Mesquite As Fiscally Fit - Video
    03/11/2013 - MCJ Sets New Policy for Article Comments

            Get our toolbar!