Deprecated: mysql_connect(): The mysql extension is deprecated and will be removed in the future: use mysqli or PDO instead in /home/mesquite/public_html/include/dbconnect.php on line 9

Warning: mysql_connect(): Headers and client library minor version mismatch. Headers:50552 Library:50633 in /home/mesquite/public_html/include/dbconnect.php on line 9
Mesquite Nevada Number One Online News Source Mesquite Citizen Journal

* Barbara Ellestad, Publisher * ALL Content Copyright 2011-2014*

Sunday, October 22, 2017

This week's poll

Has the NSA gone too far in its data collection efforts?

Yes, they need to stop
No, they are keeping us safe
I don't care

View Poll Report

one or more words required
all words required
forced & ordered phrase
Multi forced & ordered phrase
words with exceptions
 Issue date:
Date Format: dd-mm-yyyy

Cresent Hardy's Freshman Year in the Assembly
Posting Date: 07/05/2011

Michael McGreer

During Cresent Hardy's freshman term in the State Assembly he favored smokers, ignored the pleas of educators to stabilize funding, attempted to reduce wages for workers on rural public works projects, voted against prohibiting discrimination in employment and housing based upon gender, joined other Republicans in arguing that people enjoy too many entitlements, and blamed the press for making the community a joke.

Hardy (R-District 20) supported legislation (signed into law by Governor Brian Sandoval) to allow smokers to drink, eat a snack or a full meal at the same time in some restaurant areas. He took this view even though the Campaign for Smoke Free Kids reports that smoking costs Nevadans $565 million-a-year or about $554 per household and causes a loss of Nevada productivity of an estimated $903 million. These amounts do not include health costs from exposure to secondhand smoke, smoking-caused fires, smokeless tobacco use, or cigar and pipe smoking. Tobacco use also imposes additional costs such as workplace productivity losses and damage to property.

Hardy voted no on a bill to ensure sufficient funding for K-12 public education for the 2011-2013 biennium. He disagreed with the claim that Nevadans spends less per pupil than other states arguing that Nevada provides somewhere between $9,000 and $14,000 per student thus ranking education in Nevada at 26th in the nation. "I think we have a fair budget for education," Hardy commented at his June Town Hall meeting.

However, the 2010 annual survey by Education Week magazine ranks Nevada 50th in the nation for the quality of its public K-12 education and gives Nevada an overall report card score of D. The nation, as a whole, earned a C. Nevada's overall score was dragged down in four main categories: 1) potential for success, 2) K-12 achievement, 3) ratio of teachers to students need and 4) school finance. Nevada ranks 48th in the nation in education spending. On average Nevada politicians spend one-third the nation's average and have a higher average teacher to student ratio (19.41 versus 15.38). According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, Nevada students in grades 4 and 8 are below average in math, reading, science and writing.

If one focuses on overall outcome instead of spending input, it's clear to see why Nevada is ranked so low. To that end, Hardy joined in supporting a bill that required the Board of Regents to increase their focus on auditing. In another piece of legislation, (Assembly Bill 222) he agreed to install a four-tier educator evaluation system. A four-tier system represents a shift from the current binary system that classifies teachers as either satisfactory or unsatisfactory. The new categories include highly effective, effective, minimally effective and ineffective.

Unfortunately, he and his fellow supporters of these two pieces of legislation are simply attempting to shift the performance problem from a lack of funds to blaming administrators and teachers. Neither of the legislative initiatives have any merit, primarily because both audits and evaluations 1) occur after a performance has occurred, 2) are statistically unreliable and biased towards favoritism, 3) create fear and anxiety and 4) put up barriers to productivity.

In higher education, students attending the University of Nevada, Las Vegas and University of Nevada, Reno will pay 13 percent more in tuition this fall which will add about $400 a year for full-time attendees.

During his June Town Hall meeting, Hardy told the group that he introduced a bill (AB 312) on prevailing wage in

order to improve the benefits to contractors and reduce costs on public work projects. The bill died in committee.

Specifically, the bill attempted to reduce overtime expenses for contractors and eliminate collective bargaining on overtime for workers on public works projects. In addition, the bill attempted to modify the way the Labor Commissioner sets prevailing wages for public works projects performed in a county. The intent was to build into the Commission's survey the lower wages paid to workers in rural areas.

Hardy voted against a bill that prohibited discrimination in employment and housing based upon gender. The record doesn't show why a state legislator would vote against discrimination. Perhaps it's because discrimination is adequately covered by federal and constitutional law. Nonetheless, bills such as this are often introduced to tease out a legislators' biases.

During the Town Hall, Hardy suggested that the state and nation are teetering on a slippery slope because of an attitude of entitlements. Entitlements are a hot topic between Republican and Democrats these days. Nationally, Republicans seem to be after Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Nationally, Democrats have offered up cuts in defense and farm, livestock and dairy subsidies in addition to ending tax breaks for the oil and other industries.

Recipients of livestock subsidies (entitlements) for farms in Nevada totaled $12,848,000 between 1995-2010. Then there are subsidies in fishing, dairy, mining, oil and gas, public land development, water development and even the chemical industries. And, there are set-asides for public works projects, and community development project block grants. In the very near future, Hardy must define which entitlements (subsidies) he prefers and those he wishes would go away or be diverted to the private sector.

Hardy is, and will remain, under press scrutiny while he is a member of the Assembly. In his recent Town Hall meeting, Hardy said he was looking forward to having some youth in his life. He is tired, he said, of dealing with these hateful old people. He may get his wish, but the distribution of the population may be different than he desires.

The average Assembly district in Clark County has a population of 64,229 and the majority of Clark County is Democrat. Further, the population he serves is no longer all-white ranchers, farmers, contractors and allegedly corrupt water right buyers and sellers.

His region, like others in Clark County, has boomed, adding to its growth among minority residents; Hispanics grew 82% and Asians dwarfed even that at 116%. With the combined minority population now at 46%, whites may fast becoming the Nevada minority.

In addition to representing a minority population, Nevada's Hispanics tend to vote as a bloc, opening the possibility that they may also be treated as a community of interest in drawing boundaries.

Certainly, the Hispanic bloc will look unfavorably at wage limitations. Minorities, including those with a gender issue, will not look kindly on gender discrimination. And younger people are less inclined to smoke than the old timers. The old people he is tired of dealing with will certainly have something to say about cuts in Social Security, and trading off Medicare, Medicaid for private sector vouchers.

Hardy's choices during his freshman year reflect a narrow view of the health, educational and economic needs of his constituency. The people deserve better.

Michael M. McGreer writes on public policy. His books: No Harm, No Foul, Bioterrorism in the 21st century, and All Rivers Flow West, are both available on Amazon. Click here to see his blog


  • Posted Date: 07/05/2011
    Very interesting and informative.
    By: Betty Haines
  • Posted Date: 07/05/2011
    Very good reporting. Finally an honest look at the FACTS, not just the spin a politician wants to put on his vote. I would suggest that if Hardy is sick of "these hateful old people" he should get out of politics because he just insulted most of the residents of this town.
    By: David G
  • Posted Date: 07/07/2011
    Thanks, once again, Mike for the very informative article with all of the facts. I bet Mr Hardy's 'old hateful parents, who also fall in with the rest of us 'old hateful people' are very proud of him. Hmm, and yet another form of discrimination and he was actually elected, guess people weren't listening to his words. Maybe they'll start listening to what he's really saying! Thanks, again Mike. By: Elyce R
    By: Elyce
  • Posted Date: 09/16/2011
    Way to use the internet to help pepole solve problems!
    By: Jeneva
    Opinion (2000 Characters)  
    Publish My Opinion    
    CAPTCHA Image
    Reload Image

            Get our toolbar!